Carlos says that the xyz is not congruent to pqr because there is no ssa theorem or postulate. in two or more complete sentences, explain why or why not carlos is correct. justify your answer using triangle congruency postulates, theorems, and definitions.

He is correct because he used the congruence postulates, theorems correctly.

36/60

36/2=18

60/2=30

18/30

18/3=6

30/3=10

6/10

6/2=3

10/2=5

your final answer would be 3/5 of an

hope this !

answer: the answer is (b) amie should have multiplied

step-by-step explanation: given a sphere and a cylinder with same radius and height.

let, 'r' be the radius of the cylinder and sphere and 'h' be the height of the cylinder. according to the question,

r = h.

now, the volume of the sphere will be

and the volume of the cylinder will be

therefore, we have

thus, ammie should have multiplied the volume of the sphere