An experiment repeated 5 times is more reliable than an experimment repeated 20 times

The given statement is false

Step-by-step explanation:

Given that an experiment repeated 5 times is more reliable than an experiment repeated 20 times.

The statement is false.

Any result found by way of experiment will be more reliable if more number of trials are done.  

For example, consider toss of a coin.  If we try for 2 times, we may get prob for head as 0 sometimes 1/2 or sometimes 1. This is because 2 is very short number of trials to decide.  But when you increase to 10, you may get more reliable.  SO if number of repititions increase, the more reliable the results would be.

answer: which of the following can speed up the rate at which the liver breaks  

down alcohol?

question 1 options:

carbohydrates  

coffee  

nothing  

high-protein meals  

step-by-step explanation:

median is the value separating the higher half of a data sample, a population or probablity distribution from the lower half.

step-by-step explanation:

say you have 3,8,7,3,1,9,8 order them from lowest to highest

if orderd it would be 1,3,3,7,8,8,9 now you take away from the lowest and the highest until you end up in the middle.

so you would remove the 1 and 9 leaving you with 5 digits remaining

when you've reached the middle that would be your answer so in this case the answer is 7

if there were two numbers left say 7 and 5 you'd and them together so 12 then divide by 2 witch would equal 6 so the answer would be 6

good luck on that project hoped i you at all