Latasha was presented with the following data set and argued that there was no correlation between x and y. is latasha correct? use the regression equation to explain your reasoning.

Yes, La Tasha is correct, because the correlation coefficient is r=0

Step-by-step explanation:

Please, see the attached file.

Thanks.

Correlations are used to determine the association between the variables of a regression equation.

Latasha's claim is correct, because there is no correlation between x and y.

From the table, we can see that:

As the values of x increases, the value of y is either 4 or 5; i.e. the value of y increases to 5, and then decreases to 4

This means that, the values of x do not correlate with the values of y.

In other words, there is no correlation between x and y.

Hence, Latasha's claim is correct

Read more about correlation at:

link

120 seems like the most sensible answer.

step-by-step explanation:

if there is only one topping on all caramel apples and there's 120 of them. then all apples should/will be covered in sprinkles. make sense?