Norm must pay to have trash collected he can put out 1 barrel of trash per week a rectangler container measure 32 inches by 18 inches by 10 inches and a cycling rick container measure 30 inches high by 20 inches wide both are on sale for 9.99 which one holds the most trash

The Cycling Rick container can hold more trash.

Step-by-step explanation:

The rectangular container is basically a rectangular prism, so to find its volume, we are using the formula for the volume of a rectangular prism:

where

is the volume

is the width

is the height

is the length

We know that the rectangular container is 32 inches by 18 inches by 10 inches, so , , and . Let's replace the values in our formula:

The rectangular container can hold 5760 cubic inches of trash.

Now, the Cycling Rick container is basically a cylinder, so to find its volume, we are suing the formula for the volume of a cylinder:

where

is the volume

is the radius

is the height

We know that the its height is 30 inches, so . Since the container is 20 inches wide, its diameter is 20 inches, and since the radius is half the diameter, . Let's replace the values:

The Cycling Rick container can hold 9424.78 cubic inches of trash.

Since 9424.78 cubic inches is bigger than 5760 cubic inches, we can conclude that the Cycling Rick container can hold more trash.

the results from a pre-test for students for the year 2000 and the year 2010 are illustrated in the box plot. what do these results tell us about how students performed on the 29 question pre-test for the two years?

if we compare only the lowest and highest scores between the two years, we might conclude that the students in 2010 did better than the students in 2010. this conclusion seems to follow since the lowest score of 8 in 2010 is greater in value than the lowest score of 6 in 2000. also, the highest score of 28 in 2010 is greater in value than the highest score of 27 in 2000.

but the box portion of the illustration gives us more detailed information. the middle bar in each box shows us that the median score of 20 in 2000 is greater in value than the median score of 17 in 2010. further, we note that the box and whiskers divide the illustration into four pieces. each of these four pieces represents the same portion of students. so, the upper half of the students in 2000 scored in the same score range as the upper one-fourth of the students in 2010, see the illustration at a score of 20.

by considering the upper one-fourth, upper half, and upper three-fourths instead of just the lowest and highest scores, we would conclude that the students as a whole did much better in 2000 than in 2010. we would conclude that as a whole the students in 2010 are less prepared than the students in 2000.

in this section, we discuss box-and-whisker plots and the five key values used in constructing a box-and-whisker plot. the key values are called a five-number summary, which consists of the minimum, first quartile, median, third quartile, and maximum.

step-by-step explanation:

graph them on a graphing calculator, press 2nd trace. select intersect. hit enter until it says answer. ti 84 works best

step-by-step explanation: