Using rigid motion, which statement is true about the triangles?
a. △abc is congruent to △fed
b. the triangles are not congruent.
c. △abc is congruent to △def .
d. △abc is congruent to △fde .

  d. △abc is congruent to △fde

step-by-step explanation:

triangle abc is reflected across the x-axis. the corresponding vertices are

the names of the triangles in the congruence statement must have corresponding vertices in the same order. that is, △abc is congruent to △fde.

this is a very good question

step-by-step explanation:

i got a hair cut today from my mom not to flex just to flex kim jon un is one rad fellow i'd say you'd need to take the hairline in kinda like a box shape like someone rammed a lego brick into your head. from there you really need to take the top up keeping with that boxy aesthetic, finally coat the whole thing with gel if your country economics are failing or whatever you can just coat it with the starving children's food rations. about 5 orphans per strand is a good ratio. good luck with the fresh cut my dude

the 1st digit is in the 100s n its 1

step-by-step explanation:

3,589÷18 = 199.389

so the first digit of the quotient is in the 100s n its 1