Vera claimed the solution set on the number line represents the inequality - 78. 2x:
-82
81
80
79
78
which error did vera make?
o vera wrote the inequality with the variable on the left side of the relation symbol.
vera wrote a relation symbol that does not represent the direction of the ray
vera selected an inequality that does not include -79 in its solution set.
vera used the wrong number in her inequality.

22.83 repeating

step-by-step explanation:

137 ÷ 6 is 22.8333333 therefore we understand that 3 is repeating.

happy to

pls mark as brainliest

is there a graph

step-by-step explanation:

no oblique asymptote

step-by-step explanation:

to find the oblique asymptote of f(x)

here numerator has degree 1 and denomintor degree 2

degree of numerator < degree of denominator

hence there is no oblique asymptote

when the degree of the denominator > that of the numerator, we saw that the value in the denominator got so much bigger, so quickly,   giving us a horizontal asymptote of the x-axis. or we can write

f(x) = a polynomial of x + a proper fraction.

in this case only we have oblique asymptotes but not when numerator has less degree.