Consider the following argument dags bark jary doesn't bark therofore, jacy is nat a dog here is how several students formalized this arsument. only one of them found a correct answer. select which. daenerys: let's define the following predicates: d-"dos. b-barksj- joey. then the arzument is 3.-9 (simplification of 2) 4, d(modus tollens from 3, and 1) aime: predicates: dix)xis a dog. bx)x barks. than the argumant is 1.dxx)(assumption) 2.-d0oey) (assumption 3. djoeyboey) lunliversal instantiation of 1.) . daey) (modus tollons from 2. and 1.) joffrey: i will use these predicates: d-"dog b-barks".then the argument is: 2.-500en(assumptian) 3. -dacy) (modus tollens from 2.and 1.) arya: let the following predicates be defined: d(1,-"х is a dog". bo x barks." then the argument is: 1,xidxb(assumption) 3. dicey)-buoey] 4universalinstantiation of 1. ) (modus tollens from 2. and 1.) loffreyr ame daenerys