subject
Mathematics, 19.07.2019 01:10 heyitstierney5610

Use cramer's rule to solve for y without solving for x, z, and w. 4x + y + z + w = 6 3x + 7y - z + w = 1 7x + 3y - 5z + 8w = - 3 x + y + z + 2w = 3

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on Mathematics

question
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 14:40
Asequence is defined recursively by the formula  f(n  +  1)  =  f(n)  +  3 . the first term of the sequence is  –4. what is the next term in the sequence? –7–117
Answers: 1
question
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 15:20
(a) (8%) compute the probability of an even integer among the 100 integers 1! , 2! , 3! , until 100! (here n! is n factorial or n*(n-1)*(n-2) *… 1) (b) (16%) compute the probability of an even integer among the 100 integers: 1, 1+2, 1+2+3, 1+2+3+4, …., 1+2+3+… + 99, and 1+2+3+… + 100
Answers: 1
question
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 17:30
Simplify this expression.2(10) + 2(x – 4) a. 2x + 16 b. x + 12 c. 2x + 12 d. x + 16
Answers: 2
question
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 18:00
How many triangles can be drawn with side lengths 4 centimeters, 4.5 centimeters, and 9 centimeters? explain
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
Use cramer's rule to solve for y without solving for x, z, and w. 4x + y + z + w = 6 3x + 7y - z + w...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 24.02.2021 23:10
question
Mathematics, 24.02.2021 23:10
question
Mathematics, 24.02.2021 23:10
question
Engineering, 24.02.2021 23:10
question
English, 24.02.2021 23:10
Questions on the website: 13722363