22. abnormalities in the 1980s, it was generally believed that congenital abnormalities affected about 5% of the nation’s children. some people believe that the increase in the number of chemicals in the environment has led to an increase in the incidence of abnormalities. a recent study examined 384 children and found that 46 of them showed signs of an abnormality. is this strong evidence that the risk has increased? a) write appropriate hypotheses. b) check the necessary assumptions and conditions. c) perform the mechanics of the test. what is the p-value? d) explain carefully what the p-value means in context. e) what’s your conclusion? f) do environmental chemicals cause congenital abnormalities? 23. absentees the national center

Step-by-step explanation:

Set up null and alternate hypothesis

H0: p =0.05

Ha: p>0.05

(One tailed test at 5% level)

Sample size n =384

Sample proportion p = 46/384 =0.1198

p difference = 0.1198-0.05 =0.0698

Std error =

Test statistic = 4.23

p value = 0.000012

Since p<0.05, we reject null hypothesis

There is more than 99.95% probability that proportion is more than 0.05

We accept the claim that the risk has increased.

we'll this would mean that the dunk tank and the bounce house are the same for 20 hours because the 2 represents that the two activities, and the 20 represents the amount of hours they both are. so with this said, it means that the answer is c. the costs for a dunk tank and bounce house are the same for 20 hours.

c.the costs for a dunk tank and bounce house are the same for 20 hours.

hope this .

something over 10 so ? /10

step-by-step explanation: