Marcus states that angle orp and angle lrp are a linear
pair. which best describes his statement?
o he is correct. the angles share a common vertex so
they are a linear pair.
o he is correct. the angles share a common ray so they
are a linear pair.
o he is incorrect. angle orp does not form a linear pair
with another angle in the diagram.
he is incorrect. ray ro and ray rl are not opposite
rays.

mk./km: lm

step-by-step explanation:

,mlmlm

; mk

lk

1. sometimes

2. never true

3. sometimes

step-by-step explanation:

these are pretty self explanatory if you know what supp right and com angles are

b) k’(6, 4); l’(3, 3)

step-by-step explanation:

a 270° clockwise rotation maps every point (x, y) to (y, -x). (it negates the x-coordinate and then switches it and the y-coordinate.)

this means the endpoints of the side congruent to kl, k' and l', would be mapped as:

k'(-4, 6)→(6, 4)

l'(-3, 3)→(3, 3)

maya’s expression will generate the wrong sum because she violated the commutative property.

step-by-step explanation: