In a study of the relationship between socio-economic class and unethical behavior, 129 university of california undergraduates at berkeley were asked to identify themselves as having low or high social-class by comparing thmeselves to others with the most (least) money. most(least) education, and most(least) respected jobs. they were also presented with a jar of individually wrapped candy and informed that the candy were for children in a nearby laboratory, but that they could take some if they wanted. after completing some unrelated tasks, participants reported the number of candies they had taken. it was found that those who were identified as upper-class took more candy than others. for the study, identify: a) the casesb)the variables, and their typesc) the main research question

yess

step-by-step explanation:

idk whyy this is happening, i cant even read my notification bc i keep getting errors

~coco

no idea

step-by-step explanation:

i think u have 12 apples sorry again i don't really know if it correct i'm just tryna hrlp people out.

statement #3: proof- ang is congruent to ang ecd : angles are congruent.  

step-by-step explanation:

1: the missing angles in statement #3  

a.) acb  

reason- the reason why the answer is acb is because angle ecd and angle acb are both the same size *that's what the word congruent means this is really simple.  

2: the missing word in reason #3  

c.) vertical  

reason- the reason why the answer is vertical is because the angles in that diagram on figure 2 is slanted, which is vertical, and the e and a both lay on vertical lines. along with the other's, but e and a are the 2 main points you want to focus on. and c is kind of like your starting point, because c is for both angles, not just one.  

i hope that was and understanding.