It is quite often useful to consider the effect of some specific propositions in the context of some general background evidence that remains fixed, rather than in the complete absence of information. the following questions ask you to prove more general versions of the product rule and bayes’ rule, with respect to some background evidence e: a. prove the conditionalized version of the general product rule: p(x, y | e)= p(x | y, e)p(y | e) .

y=mx+b

step-by-step explanation:

m is slope, b is y-intercept

the solution is 12x-6y

for the friend request.

when a figure, such as triangle (xyz) is reflected over the line y = x to create x'y'z' the x-coordinates and y-coordinates of the original image (pre-image) will be reversed for the image. (e.g., (x, y) > (y, x)) this means that the pre-image position of the x- and y-coordinates switch places which in turn provides a mirror like image of the original xyz.  

i notice that when i draw a line segment from x to x', that the points are parallel from each other -- they are exactly across from each other and do not intersect with any other points.  

yes, think i would see the same characteristic if you drew the line segment connecting y with the reflecting line and then y' with the reflecting line because of the essence of reflections. because it is a mirror image, each point was effected the same way which leads me to conclude that they same would apply to y and y'.

wedfghjkl;

tyuiop[]ghjkl;

step-by-step explanatio89