Sara and sam are each working on a science project in which they need to research the individual masses of the nine planets (including the dwarf planet pluto as the ninth planet). sara completes her data for the planets' masses in kilograms while sam's data is in milligrams. sara: planet mass (in kilograms) jupiter 1.989 · 1027 saturn 5.685 · 1026 neptune 1.024 · 1026 uranus 8.681 · 1025 earth 5.974 · 1024 venus 4.869 · 1024 mars 6.419 · 1023 mercury 3.302 · 1023 pluto 1.31 · 1022 sam: planet mass (in milligrams) jupiter 1.989 · 1033 saturn 5.685 · 1032 neptune 1.024 · 1032 uranus 8.681 · 1031 earth 5.974 · 1030 venus 4.869 · 1030 mars 6.419 · 1029 mercury 3.302 · 1029 pluto 1.31 · 1028 approximate how many times greater saturn's mass is than mercury's. 2,000,000 200,000 20,000 2,000 me quickly

the results from a pre-test for students for the year 2000 and the year 2010 are illustrated in the box plot. what do these results tell us about how students performed on the 29 question pre-test for the two years?

if we compare only the lowest and highest scores between the two years, we might conclude that the students in 2010 did better than the students in 2010. this conclusion seems to follow since the lowest score of 8 in 2010 is greater in value than the lowest score of 6 in 2000. also, the highest score of 28 in 2010 is greater in value than the highest score of 27 in 2000.

but the box portion of the illustration gives us more detailed information. the middle bar in each box shows us that the median score of 20 in 2000 is greater in value than the median score of 17 in 2010. further, we note that the box and whiskers divide the illustration into four pieces. each of these four pieces represents the same portion of students. so, the upper half of the students in 2000 scored in the same score range as the upper one-fourth of the students in 2010, see the illustration at a score of 20.

by considering the upper one-fourth, upper half, and upper three-fourths instead of just the lowest and highest scores, we would conclude that the students as a whole did much better in 2000 than in 2010. we would conclude that as a whole the students in 2010 are less prepared than the students in 2000.

in this section, we discuss box-and-whisker plots and the five key values used in constructing a box-and-whisker plot. the key values are called a five-number summary, which consists of the minimum, first quartile, median, third quartile, and maximum.

step-by-step explanation:

d

step-by-step explanation:

i used the pitagoras theoreme

for a it would be 24 children.

for b i don't understand the question. is it saying for each individual person they pick 5 reds to 7 greens or is it the whole group. clarify and i hope this can you.

step-by-step explanation: