Need ! will give brainilest
michael and derrick each completed a separate proof to show that corresponding angles akg and elk are congruent. who completed the proof incorrectly? explain.

michael's proof
statement justification
1. line ab ∥ line ef with transversal segment gj 1. given
2. angle akg is congruent to angle akl 2. vertical angles theorem
3. angle bkl is congruent to angle elk 3. alternate interior angles theorem
4. angle akg is congruent to angle elk 4. transitive property

derrick's proof

statement justification
1. line ab ∥ line ef with transversal segment gj 1. given
2. angle akg is congruent to angle bkl 2. vertical angles theorem
3. angle bkl is congruent to angle elk 3. alternate interior angles theorem
4. angle akg is congruent to angle elk 4. transitive property

you might have to contact customer support. if you have it on your iphone you just got into your settings> subscriptions> cancel

step-by-step explanation:

system of linear equation

step-by-step explanation:

as given in the data

a= 20 , b= -12

let us suppose that it is a straight line equation

now we know the formula for the system of linear equation

b= ma + c )

here m is slope of a straight line which is equal to formula

m=   (ii)

and here c is a constant

now putting the value of a and b in equation (ii)

m=

m=

putting the value of a,b and m in equation (i) gives us

-12 = + c

-12=-12 + c

adding 12 to both sides

-12 +12 = -12 +12 +c

0 =c

or c=0

as the value of the constant is zero which gives us that it is a linear equation and this order pair satisfies the system of linear equations.

we would need a picture of the quadrilateral in order to answer the question. also, it seems that the question is missing some components.