subject
Mathematics, 17.10.2019 03:10 jamarstand

Reorder the premises in the argument below to show that the conclusion follows as a valid consequence from the premises. (they are based on tarsky’s world.) it may be to rewrite the statements in if-then form and replace some by their contrapositives. a. every object that is to the right of all the blue objects is above all the triangles. b. if an object is a circle, then it is to the right of all blue objects. c. if an object is not a circle, then it is not gray. ∴ all the gray objects are above the triangles

ansver
Answers: 2

Another question on Mathematics

question
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 12:30
Given f(x) = 17-x^2what is the average rate of change in f(x) over the interval [1, 5]?
Answers: 2
question
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 13:00
Amaple syrup producer records th amount of sap collected from each of his trees. the line plot shows the results for one day. what is the least amount of sap any one tree produced?
Answers: 1
question
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 21:30
Look at triangle wxy what is the length (in centimeters) of the side wy of the triangle?
Answers: 1
question
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 22:00
Manuela claims that and are congruent. which statement best describes her claim? she is incorrect because the segments do not have the same orientation. she is incorrect because the segments do not have the same length. she is correct because the segments have the same length. she is correct because the segments have the same orientation.
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
Reorder the premises in the argument below to show that the conclusion follows as a valid consequenc...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 20.04.2020 20:30
question
Mathematics, 20.04.2020 20:30
question
Mathematics, 20.04.2020 20:30
Questions on the website: 13722361