Make a decision about the given claim. do not use any formal procedures and exact calculations. use only the rare event rule. claim: a coin favors heads when tossed, and there are 10 heads in 22 tosses. which of the following is correct? a. there is not sufficient evidence to support the claim because there are substantially more heads than tails. b. there does appear to besufficient evidence to support the claim because there aresubstantially more heads than tails. c. there does appear to be sufficient evidence to support the claim because there are not substantially more heads than tails. d. there is notsufficient evidence to support the claim because there are not substantially more heads than tails.

D.There is not sufficient evidence to support the claim because there are not substantially more heads than tails.

Step-by-step explanation:

Using the rare event rule, the assumption that the coin favors heads when tossed would only be true if there was a significant gap in the number of heads and the number of tails in the tosses.

Our results are 10 heads and 12 tails. This means that the correct answer is:

D.There is not sufficient evidence to support the claim because there are not substantially more heads than tails.

so far i think you have the right thing going for you just remember soh cah toh

step-by-step explanation:

sine over hypotenuse

cosine   equals adjacent

tangent over hypotenuse

idk

step-by-step explanation: