Ashoe is 9 inches long. is a line of 5 shoes longer than 3 feet?

Yes, because 3 feet and 9 inches is greater than 3 feet.

Step-by-step explanation:

First, you need to find how many inches is the line of 5 shoes. So, you would multiply 9 and 5, which equals 45. So, the line is 45 inches long. However, you want to find the number in feet. Next, you would divide 45 by 12, which equals 3 feet and 9 inches. Because 12 times 3 plus 9 equals 45. So the line of 5 shoes is longer than 3 feet.

yes

Step-by-step explanation:

9x5=45 and 3 ft = 36 inches so 5 shoes lined up (45in) is in fact longer than 3 ft

∠1≅∠2 by the alternate exterior angles theorem.

step-by-step explanation:

given, a ∥ b and ∠1 ≅ ∠3 .we have to prove that e ∥ f

we know that ∠1≅∠3 and that a || b because they are given. we see that by the alternate exterior angles theorem. therefore, ∠2≅∠3 by the transitive property. so, we can conclude that e || f by the converse alternate exterior angles theorem.

we have to fill the missing statement.

transitivity property states that if a = b and b = c, then a = c.

now, given ∠1≅∠3 and by transitivity property ∠2≅∠3 .

hence, to apply transitivity property one angle must be common which is not in result after applying this property which is ∠1.

the only options in which ∠1 is present are ∠1 and ∠2, ∠1 and ∠4

∠1 and ∠4 is not possible ∵ after applying transitivity we didn't get ∠4.

hence, the missing statement is ∠1≅∠2.

so, ∠1≅∠2 by the alternate exterior angles theorem.

b. 1.25 hr

step-by-step explanation:

if you have a constant speed of 60 mph, then you have a ratio between 60 mi. to 1 hr. dividing both sides by 60 we get the ratio

1 mi. to

then mult. both sides by 75 we get the ratio

75 mi. to

simplifying we get

75 mi. to

or 1.25 hr.