Given: line segment n m is parallel to line segment p o. and angle 1 is-congruent-to angle 3 prove: line segment n m is parallel to line segment n o. 4 lines are connected. line segment l m connects to line segment m n to form angle 1. line segment m n connects to line segment n o to form angle 2. line segment n o connects to line segment o p to form angle 3. a 2-column table has 5 rows. column 1 is labeled statements with the entries line segment n m is parallel to line segment p o, angle 2 is-congruent-to angle 3, angle 1 is-congruent-to angle 3, angle 1 is-congruent-to angle 2, line segment l m is parallel to line segment n o. what is the missing reason in the proof? given transitive property alternate interior angles theorem converse alternate interior angles theorem

c. y = 1/4 x + 5

step-by-step explanation:

first, put the equation of the line on the graph into slope-intercept form

(y = mx + b):   y = -4x + 8

second, a perpendicular line has to have "an opposite/reciprocal slope" to the original slope. so, find the "m" value in your original equation (it's -4, right? )

original slope: m = -4   perpendicular slope: change the sign to its opposite and find the reciprocal ("flip" the number)

new slope is now positive (b/c the original slope was negative 4), and it's 1/4 (not the original slope of 4 or 4/1)

i believe the correct answer is option 4.principalities were small territories that were run by russian rulers.

which statement correctly defines principalities in northern asia in the 1200s? principalities were small territories that were run by russian rulers.

hope i could ! : )