subject
Mathematics, 27.11.2019 19:31 vanessa7714102010

Table
samuel said that 16: 36 was equivalent to 72: 32.

what was samuel’s error?

1) the ratio was not chosen from the same columns.
2) he did not look at the correct rows.
3) this problem was impossible. 16: 36 has no equivalent ratios.
4) the first and second terms for both ratios need to be in the same order.

hurry

ansver
Answers: 3

Another question on Mathematics

question
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 21:30
Aye asap pls ! markin da brainiest too ! btw da step choices are all add, distribute, divide, n subtract
Answers: 2
question
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 22:30
Tan198=asin164=? how to solve this? ?
Answers: 1
question
Mathematics, 22.06.2019 04:00
What is being done to the variable in the equation 3 + g = -9? the number 3 is being added to it. the number 3 is being subtracted from it. the number -9 is being added to it. the number -9 is being subtracted from it.
Answers: 2
question
Mathematics, 22.06.2019 05:00
On her way to work, mrs. larsen gets a green light at a certain traffic light only 30% of the time. she wants to find the probability that she will get a green light at this traffic light all five mornings that she travels to work next week. use the following randomly generated list of 200 five-digit numbers to answer the questions and find the probability. select the digits you will use to represent a favorable outcome. how many favorable outcomes are on this list? what are they? given this simulation, what is the probability that mrs. larsen will get a green light at this traffic light all five mornings next week?
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
Table
samuel said that 16: 36 was equivalent to 72: 32.

what was samuel’s error? <...
Questions
question
Chemistry, 09.09.2021 21:40
question
Law, 09.09.2021 21:40
Questions on the website: 13722367