Mathematics, 13.02.2020 23:00 natalie2sheffield
She plans to solve for x in the first equation as her first step since both 2 and 3 can be divided
Serina should have solved for x in the second equation because it has
Serina should have solved for y in the first equation because dividing by 3 instead of by 21
solution.
Serina should have solved for y in the second equation because it has the largest coefficie
Serina should have solved for y in the first equation because the division step will be easier
Answers: 1
Another question on Mathematics
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 17:50
On a string instrument, the length of a string varies inversely as the frequency of its vibrations. an 11-inch string has a frequency of 400 cylces per second. find the frequency of a 10-icnch string.
Answers: 2
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 19:30
If the ratio of sum of the first m and n terms of an ap is m2 : n2 , show that the ratio of its mth and nth terms is (2m − 1) : (2n − 1).
Answers: 1
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 22:00
What is the solution to the equation e3x=12? round your answer to the nearest hundredth
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
She plans to solve for x in the first equation as her first step since both 2 and 3 can be divided
Questions
Mathematics, 27.06.2020 20:01
Mathematics, 27.06.2020 20:01
Mathematics, 27.06.2020 20:01
Mathematics, 27.06.2020 20:01
History, 27.06.2020 20:01
Mathematics, 27.06.2020 20:01
Mathematics, 27.06.2020 20:01
