subject
Mathematics, 15.02.2020 04:01 uticabadgirl

There are other ways of expressing uncertainty besides significant figures. For example, suppose a quantity is known to have a value between 20.4 and 20.0 and our best estimate of the value is midrange at 20.2. We could write the number as 20.2 +/- 0.2 and say that the number has a 1% uncertainty. We would also say it has 3 significant figures. If we square a number with 1% uncertainty (i. e., 2 parts in about 200) and 3 significant figures, what results?

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on Mathematics

question
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 12:50
Write a polynomial function f of least degree that has rational coefficients, a leading coefficient of 1, and the given zeros. 1, 2−√3
Answers: 2
question
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 17:00
Which inequality comparing two of the expressions is true when 0.7 < x < 0.9
Answers: 1
question
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 18:00
Jack has a piece of red ribbon that is two times as long as his piece of blue ribbon. he says that he can use two different equation to find out how long his piece of red ribbon is compared to his piece of blue ribbon is. is he correct? explain his reasoning
Answers: 1
question
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 19:30
Evaluate 3(a + b + c)squared for a = 2, b = 3, and c = 4. a. 54 b. 243 c.729 add solution .
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
There are other ways of expressing uncertainty besides significant figures. For example, suppose a q...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 20.09.2020 03:01
question
Mathematics, 20.09.2020 03:01
question
Mathematics, 20.09.2020 03:01
Questions on the website: 13722362