The table shows the dimensions of several parallelograms. use the area of each parallelogram to find the missing information for each triangle.

Here is their argument. given the obtuse angle x, we make a quadrilateral abcd with ∠dab = x, and ∠abc = 90◦, and ad = bc. say the perpendicular bisector to dc meets the perpendicular bisector to ab at p. then pa = pb and pc = pd. so the triangles pad and pbc have equal sides and are congruent. thus ∠pad = ∠pbc. but pab is isosceles, hence ∠pab = ∠pba. subtracting, gives x = ∠pad−∠pab = ∠pbc −∠pba = 90◦. this is a preposterous conclusion – just where is the mistake in the "proof" and why does the argument break down there?

The estimated number of people to attend the last bengals game of the season was 2000. the actual number of fans attending was 1200. by what percent did the estimate differ from the actual?

41/17 as a decimal rounded to the nearest hundredth