For a biology project, you measure the weight in grams and the tail length in millimeters of a group of mice. The correlation is r = 0.9. If you had measured tail length in centimeters instead of millimeters, what would be the correlation? (There are 10 millimeters in a centimeter.)

Step-by-step explanation:

Given that for a biology project, you measure the weight in grams and the tail length in millimeters of a group of mice.

The correlation is r = 0.9

If you had measured tail length in centimeters instead of millimeters, what would be the correlation?

For this we must understand the meaning of correlation and formula

Correlation is a measure of linear association between the two variables and always lie between -1 and 1

This is got by dividing covariance of (x,y) by product of std deviation of x and y

So because we changed the units of length correlation coefficient would not change.

It would remain the same as 0.90

omg what happend to your question? if you could edit this question i can

step-by-step explanation:

l.ln.lln.k.nkl

step-by-step explanation: