Southern Florida is known as the "Lightning Capital" of the U. S. It averages 25.1 lightning strikes per year per square mile with a standard deviation of 5.25. A meteorologist believes the number of strikes has increased. Using a sample of the last 40 years with 26.5 strikes, does there seem to be a significant increase? Use alpha = .01.

If we compare the p value and the significance level given we see that so we can conclude that we have enough evidence to fail reject the null hypothesis, so we can't conclude that the true mean is higher than 25.1 (significant increase) at 1% of signficance.  

Step-by-step explanation:

Data given and notation  

represent the sample mean

represent the population standard deviation for the sample  

sample size  

represent the value that we want to test

represent the significance level for the hypothesis test.  

z would represent the statistic (variable of interest)  

represent the p value for the test (variable of interest)  

State the null and alternative hypotheses.  

We need to conduct a hypothesis in order to check if the mean is higher than 25.1, the system of hypothesis would be:  

Null hypothesis:  

Alternative hypothesis:  

If we analyze the size for the sample is > 30 and we know the population deviation so is better apply a z test to compare the actual mean to the reference value, and the statistic is given by:  

 (1)  

z-test: "Is used to compare group means. Is one of the most common tests and is used to determine if the mean is (higher, less or not equal) to an specified value".  

Calculate the statistic

We can replace in formula (1) the info given like this:  

P-value

Since is a one right side test the p value would be:  

Conclusion  

If we compare the p value and the significance level given we see that so we can conclude that we have enough evidence to fail reject the null hypothesis, so we can't conclude that the true mean is higher than 25.1 (significant increase) at 1% of signficance.  

72 fudge and 75 toffee

step-by-step explanation:

i hope this : )

if gloria has "carry over" minutes, (that is, any minutes paid for but not used in a month can be applied to her payment for minutes in the next month,) her total usage for the three months is: total minutes = 320 + 243 + 489 = 1052 minutes number of 200 minute blocks = 1052/200 = 5 r52 (that is 5 with a remainder of 52) rounding up the number of 200 minute blocks gives her usage for the three months as 6 blocks. the cost for six blocks is 6 x $25 = $150 she also has 200 - 52 or 148 carry over minutes if gloria pays each month and unused minutes are lost, applying the rounding up procedure to each month gives: first month usage of 320 minutes rounds up to 2 blocks of 200 minutes for a payment of 2 x $25 = $50 second month usage of 243 minutes rounds up to 2 blocks of 200 minutes for a payment of 2 x $25 = $50 third month usage of 489 minutes rounds up to 3 blocks of 200 minutes for a payment of 3 x $25 = $75 total payments for the three months are $50 + $50 + $75 = $175 get the plan with carry over minutes!