Help I’m failing
What is the inverse of the following statement?If a triangle has three congruent angles, then it is an equiangular triangle.

If a triangle does not have three congruent angles, then it is not an equiangular triangle.

If a triangle is equiangular, then it has three congruent angles.

If a triangle has three congruent angles, then it is an equiangular triangle.

If a triangle is not equiangular, then it does not have three congruent angles.

We never did inverse propositions when I had logic.  The inverse of

if P then Q

is the proposition

if not P then not Q

We have

P: A triangle has three congruent angles

Q: it is an equilangular triangle

The inverse is thus   if not P then not Q

If a triangle does not have three congruent angles then it is not an equilangular triangle.

 First choice

The reason we didn't do inverses is it has the same truth value as the converse; the inverse is the contrapositive of the converse.

i would pic false cause it goes down towards negative

step-by-step explanation:

12cm

the answer is d