subject
Mathematics, 10.04.2020 03:20 pippyysanchezz

A scientist is studying the relationship between the depth of a watermelon vines’ roots and the weight of the watermelons produced. The scientist collects measurements from a random sample of vines. He then conducts a significance test in which the null hypothesis is that there is no correlation between the two variables versus the alternative that the correlation is greater than 0. From this test he found a P-value of 0.0032. What does this tell us?A) There is significant evidence that the correlation is greater than 0 at the 0.05 level. B) There is no significant evidence that the correlation is greater than 0 at the 0.05 level.
C) The correlation is very small. D) The correlation is very close to 1.

ansver
Answers: 2

Another question on Mathematics

question
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 19:40
The weights of broilers (commercially raised chickens) are approximately normally distributed with mean 1387 grams and standard deviation 161 grams. what is the probability that a randomly selected broiler weighs more than 1,425 grams?
Answers: 2
question
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 20:00
The function models the number of accidents per 50 million miles driven as a function
Answers: 1
question
Mathematics, 22.06.2019 01:00
Use mathematical induction to prove the statement is true for all positive integers n, or show why it is false. 1^2 + 4^2 + 7^2 + + (3n - 2)^2 = [n(6n^2-3n-1)/2]
Answers: 1
question
Mathematics, 22.06.2019 04:30
Harold moves no more than 43 of his sheep and goats into another field fewer then 22 of his animals are goats
Answers: 3
You know the right answer?
A scientist is studying the relationship between the depth of a watermelon vines’ roots and the weig...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 11.11.2020 14:00
question
History, 11.11.2020 14:00
question
Chemistry, 11.11.2020 14:00
question
Mathematics, 11.11.2020 14:00
question
English, 11.11.2020 14:00
Questions on the website: 13722361