Nigel makes the claim that x=6 is the solution to the equation 4(5x−12)−7x=5x. His work to support his claim follows.

Given: 4(5x−12)−7x=5x
Step 1: 20x−48−7x=5x
Step 2: 20x−7x−48=5x
Step 3: 13x−48=5x
Step 4: 13x−13x−48=5x−13x
Step 5: 0−48=−8x
Step 6: 6=x

Which of the following justifications can be used to justify and support Nigel's work?

Select all justifications that are correct. (There is more than one answer)

Step 6 is justified by the Associative Property.
Step 5 is justified by the Property of Additive Inverses.
Step 2 is justified by the Commutative Property.
Step 4 is justified by the Symmetric Property.
Step 1 is justified by the Distributive Property.

-22

times both sides by 2, times () by 8, add alile terms, move terms, add alike and caculate divide both sides by 3

step-by-step explanation:

we can use this expression to calculate the energy gain as a particle moves with a field or the energy loss as it moves against it. (note that it is also used to define the electron-volt, a unit of energy equal to that gained by an electron as it falls through a pd of 1 v, i.e. w = 1 ev = 1.6 10-19 c 1 v = 1.6 10-19j).in fact this expression is really nothing more than the statement that potential is the potential energy per unit charge. in this case, v= w/qis simply stating that the change in potential energy(or work done) per unit charge is equal to the change in potential (or potential difference), v.student questions: uniform electric fields2electron beamcathode+5 kvanode0 v

the answer to question 1 is -8, 28.

step-by-step explanation: