subject
Mathematics, 26.04.2020 05:18 anher

Premise 1: The defendant has no alibi for the night of the theft.
Premise 2: The stolen goods were found in the defendant's possession.
Premise 3: Two witnesses have identified the defendant as the thief.
Conclusion: The defendant is guilty of theft.
Decide whether the above argument is inductive or deductive.
tive.
Select an answer
If the above argument is inductive, decide if it is strong or weak. Select not applicable if the
argument is deductive.
Select an answer

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on Mathematics

question
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 15:40
Evaluate the following expression 1/3^2
Answers: 1
question
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 16:00
Select the correct answer. joshua likes to read. he read 6 books when he was 6 years old. every year he doubled the number of books he read the previous year. how many total books did he read between the ages of 6 and 10? a. 60 b. 90 c.186 d.187
Answers: 1
question
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 21:30
Write 5(6x+4)-2(5x-2) in the form a(bx+c) where a,b and c integers and a> 1
Answers: 2
question
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 21:50
Ab and bc are tangent to circle d. find x is ab = 3x + 8 and bc = 26. find x
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
Premise 1: The defendant has no alibi for the night of the theft.
Premise 2: The stolen goods...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 11.06.2020 23:57
question
Mathematics, 11.06.2020 23:57
question
Mathematics, 11.06.2020 23:57
question
Mathematics, 11.06.2020 23:57
question
English, 11.06.2020 23:57
Questions on the website: 13722360