subject
Mathematics, 06.05.2020 06:57 oprajapati

In a survey, 500 adults in a certain country were asked how many hours they worked in the previous week. Based on the results, a 95% confidence interval for mean number of hours worked was lower bound: 40.3 and upper bound: 41.9. Which of the following represents a reasonable interpretation of the result? For those that are not reasonable, explain the flaw. Complete parts (a) through (d) below.
(A) There is a 95% chance the mean number of hours worked by adults in this country in the previous week was between 41.5 hours and 45.6 hours.

A. Flawed. This interpretation makes an implication about individuals rather than the mean.

B. Flawed. This interpretation implies that the mean is only for last week.

C. Correct

D. Flawed. This interpretation implies that the population mean varies rather than the interval

(B) We are 95% confident that the mean number of hours worked by adults in this country in the previous week was between 41.5 hours and 45.6 hours.

A. Flawed. This interpretation does not make it clear that the 95% is the probability that the mean is within the interval.

B. Flawed. This interpretation makes an implication about individuals rather than the mean.

C. Flawed. This interpretation implies that the population mean varies rather than the interval.

D. Correct

(C) 95% of adults in this country worked between 41.5 hours and 45.6 hours last week.0D. Flawed. This interpretation does not make it clear that the 95% is the probability that the mean is within the interval.

A. Correct

B Flawed . This interpretation makes an implication about individuals rather than the mean.

C. Flawed. This interpretation implies that the mean is only for last week.

D. Flawed. This interpretation does not make it clear that the 95% is the probability that the mean is within the interval.

(D) We are 95% confident that the mean number of hours worked by adults in a particular area of this country in the previous week was between 41.5 hours and 45.6 hours.

A. Flawed; the interpretation should be about the mean number of hours worked by adults in the whole country, not about adults in the particular area.

B. Correct

C. Flawed. This interpretation implies that the population mean varies rather than the interval.

D. Flawed . This interpretation makes an implication about individuals rather than the mean.

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on Mathematics

question
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 17:30
To which sets of numbers does -12 belong? choose all answers that are correct. a) natural numbers b) integers c) real numbers d) irrational numbers
Answers: 2
question
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 19:00
45% of the trees in a park are apple trees. there are 27 apple trees in the park. how many trees are in the park in all?
Answers: 1
question
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 21:00
Atriangular field has sides of lengths 21, 39, and 41 yd. find the largest angle. (round your answer to the nearest degree.)
Answers: 1
question
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 21:30
50 plz, given the system of equations, match the following items. x + 3 y = 5 x - 3 y = -1 a) x-determinant b) y-determinant c) system determinant match the following to the pictures below.
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
In a survey, 500 adults in a certain country were asked how many hours they worked in the previous w...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 15.05.2021 23:50
question
Geography, 15.05.2021 23:50
question
Mathematics, 15.05.2021 23:50
Questions on the website: 13722367