Write your question here ( keep it simple and clear to get the best answer)

Here is their argument. given the obtuse angle x, we make a quadrilateral abcd with ∠dab = x, and ∠abc = 90◦, and ad = bc. say the perpendicular bisector to dc meets the perpendicular bisector to ab at p. then pa = pb and pc = pd. so the triangles pad and pbc have equal sides and are congruent. thus ∠pad = ∠pbc. but pab is isosceles, hence ∠pab = ∠pba. subtracting, gives x = ∠pad−∠pab = ∠pbc −∠pba = 90◦. this is a preposterous conclusion – just where is the mistake in the "proof" and why does the argument break down there?

Polygons efgh and e′f′g′h′ are shown on the coordinate grid: what set of transformations is performed on efgh to form e′f′g′h′? a. a translation 1 unit to the left followed by a 90-degree counterclockwise rotation about the origin b. a translation 1 unit to the right followed by a 90-degree counterclockwise rotation about the origin c. a 90-degree clockwise rotation about the origin followed by a translation 2 units to the right d. a 90-degree clockwise rotation about the origin followed by a translation 2 units to the left

Aresearch study is done to find the average age of all u.s. factory workers. the researchers asked every factory worker in ohio what their birth year is. this research is an example of a census survey convenience sample simple random sample