Below is a two-column proof incorrectly proving that the three angles of ΔPQR add up to 180°:

Statements Reasons
∠QRY ≅ ∠PQR Alternate Interior Angles Theorem
Draw line ZY parallel to segment PQ Construction
m∠ZRP + m∠PRQ + m∠QRY = m∠ZRY Angle Addition Postulate
∠ZRP ≅ ∠RPQ Alternate Interior Angles Theorem
m∠RPQ + m∠PRQ + m∠PQR = m∠ZRY Substitution
m∠ZRY = 180° Definition of a Straight Angle
m∠RPQ + m∠PRQ + m∠PQR = 180° Substitution

Which statement will accurately correct the two-column proof?

A. The measure of angle ZRY equals 180° by definition of supplementary angles.
B. Angles QRY and PQR should be proven congruent after the construction of line ZY.
C. The three angles of ΔPQR equal 180° according to the Transitive Property of Equality.
D. Line ZY should be drawn parallel to segment QR.

THAT THE TRIANGLE ACCORDING TO QUESTION AND I THINK SO OPTION A IS RIGHT 95%

answer: yes i agree that you should not put it on/p>

step-by-step explanation: the reason for this is that it wastes other peoples time and also make them fail as well and that is never good.

you forgot the options, but i found them anyways, the correct answer is "john wilson believes that words and actions based on the intellect are superior to those based on emotions".

john wilson is depicted as an extremely intelligent man. the point of the excerpt is to make a sort of distinction between emotional and rational intelligence. he happens to have both attributes, but he clearly favors his intellectual gifts. at the same time, because of his religious background, he's a little bit conflicted with this and it makes him ashamed.

hope this !