Karlen started painting the walls at 10:45 am, and he said that he could complete the job at 5:25 pm. His father said that five-eighths of that time was enough to paint the walls. However, when Karlen finished the job, they noticed that it actually took him 80% of an hour longer than the time predicted by the father. How much longer did Karlen predict it would take than the time it actually took him to complete the job (what part of an hour)?

0

step-by-step explanation:

you can not divide by 0 so 4 ÷ 0 would be 0

0 × 9999 =0

mark brainliest   : )

option a.

step-by-step explanation:

if you look closely at the graph, we can notice that the function is not defined at two different points.

if you look at functions b and c, you will notice that both functions are not defined at just one point. the function b is not defined at x= -5/2 and function c is not defined at x=-5. both options are discarded, given that our function should not be defined at two fiferent points.

now, if you look closely at the graph you will notice that the function sketched is not defined at x=5 and x=-2.

da freeck kinda math is this just drop out

step-by-step explanation:

answer: yes, since the line has a steeper rate of change than the exponential the y-values will be greater and they will only intersect one time.