Consider the system of equations.

y = –2x + 4,

3y + x = –3

Which statement is true of this system of equations?
Both equations are in slope-intercept form.
The first equation converted to slope-intercept form is y + 2x = 4.
The second equation converted to slope-intercept form is .y = negative one-third x minus 1
Neither equation is in slope-intercept form.

Henry is an avid reader, he devours 90 pages in half an hour how many pages has henry read per minute?

Juliana says that she can use the patterns of equivalent ratios in the multiplication table below to write an infinite number of ratios that are equivalent to 6: 10. which statement explains whether juliana is correct? she is correct because she can multiply 6 and 10 by any number to form an equivalent ratio. she is correct because 6: 10 can be written as 1: 2 and there are an infinite number of ratios for 1: 2. she is not correct because the multiplication table does not include multiples of 10. she is not correct because 6: 10 is equivalent to 3: 5 and there are only 9 ratios in the multiplication table that are equivalent to 3: 5.

How can (square root of 25) ^2 be rewritten?