subject
Mathematics, 06.05.2020 20:30 tori6886

Maude evaluated the expression (32)–3. 1. 32 • (−3) 2. 36 3. 729 Analyze Maude’s work. Is she correct? If not, what was her mistake? Yes, she is correct. No, she should have added the exponents instead of multiplying. No, her exponent should be a negative value No, when evaluating 36, she should have found the product of 3 and 6.

ansver
Answers: 3

Another question on Mathematics

question
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 14:00
What is the slope of a line that is perpendicular to y = 3x + 1
Answers: 1
question
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 18:00
The los angels ram scored 26, 30, 48, and 31 pts in their last four games. how many pts do they need to score in super bowl liii in order to have an exact mean average of 35 pts over five games. write and solve and equation. use x to represent the 5th game.
Answers: 1
question
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 23:00
Is there a direction u in which the rate of change of f(x,y)equals=x squared minus 3 xy plus 4 y squaredx2−3xy+4y2 at p(1,2) equals 14? give reasons for your answer. choose the correct answer below. a. no. the given rate of change is smaller than the minimum rate of change. b. no. the given rate of change is larger than the maximum rate of change. c. yes. the given rate of change is larger than the minimum rate of change and smaller than the maximum rate of change.
Answers: 2
question
Mathematics, 22.06.2019 03:30
The difference between the measures of two complementary angles is 14. find the measure of both angles.
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
Maude evaluated the expression (32)–3. 1. 32 • (−3) 2. 36 3. 729 Analyze Maude’s work. Is she correc...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 09.11.2020 20:50
question
Physics, 09.11.2020 20:50
Questions on the website: 13722367