Ariosto has developed a new kind of antibiotic. For the antibiotic to be sufficiently effective, it has to kill at least 90% of bacteria when applied to a harmful bacteria culture. He applied his antibiotic to one petri dish full of harmful bacteria – petri dish A. However, he did not apply the antibiotic to another identical petri dish that he had – petri dish B. (Ariosto successfully used cloning in order to ensure that petri dish B was in fact identical to petri dish A at the very beginning of the study).

Ariosto then analyzed the two petri dishes. He found that 97% of the bacteria in petri dish A were dead, whereas 0% of the bacteria in petri dish B were dead.

What type of statistical study did Ariosto use?

6.5

step-by-step explanation:

you said it was in the question

~courtney

$649.60

step-by-step explanation:

60.9774

step-by-step explanation:

because when you add 47.6 plus 7.32 equals 54.92

and when you add .0574 + 6= 6.0574

and when you add 54.92 and 6.0574 you get the answer of 60.9774.

plzz mark brainlest last one got deleted. cause i didn't explain it but i did but i understand what the mod meant

no oblique asymptote

step-by-step explanation:

to find the oblique asymptote of f(x)

here numerator has degree 1 and denomintor degree 2

degree of numerator < degree of denominator

hence there is no oblique asymptote

when the degree of the denominator > that of the numerator, we saw that the value in the denominator got so much bigger, so quickly,   giving us a horizontal asymptote of the x-axis. or we can write

f(x) = a polynomial of x + a proper fraction.

in this case only we have oblique asymptotes but not when numerator has less degree.