For which of these sets of data would all the points be displayed on a scatterplot if the window size on a regression calculator were set to 5 less-than-or-equal-to x less-than-or-equal-to 15; 25 less-than-or-equal-to y less-than-or-equal-to 75? A 2-column table with 6 rows. Column 1 is labeled x with entries 6, 7, 9, 11, 13, 14. Column 2 is labeled y with entries 27, 33, 39, 49, 58, 71. A 2-column table with 6 rows. Column 1 is labeled x with entries 6, 7, 9, 11, 13, 16. Column 2 is labeled y with entries 27, 33, 39, 49, 58, 71. A 2-column table with 6 rows. Column 1 is labeled x with entries 27, 33, 39, 49, 58, 71. Column 2 is labeled y with entries 6, 7, 9, 11, 13, 14. A 2-column table with 6 rows. Column 1 is labeled x with entries 27, 33, 39, 49, 58, 71. Column 2 is labeled y with entries 6, 7, 9, 11, 13, 16.

d

step-by-step explanation:

i used the pitagoras theoreme

if the probability is 1/12, 75 people will receive a $25 gift card

step-by-step explanation:

starting with:    

5 + x - 12 = 2x - 7   

5 + x - 12 - x = 2x - 7 - x (subtract x from both sides)   

5 - 12 = x - 7 (combine and cancel x's from both sides)   

5 - 12 + 7 = x - 7 + 7 (add 7 to both sides)   

0 = x (add numbers together on both sides)       

so in order for the equation to be true, x must be 0.   

trying x = -0.5   

5 + x - 12 = 2x - 7 (original equation)   

5 + -0.5 - 12 = 2(-0.5) - 7 (plug in value of x)   

5 + -0.5 - 12 = -1 - 7 (did multiplication)   

-7.5 = -8 (did addition on both sides)       

since -7.5 is obviously not equal to -8, the value of -0.5 for x is wrong.   

trying x = 0   

5 + x - 12 = 2x - 7 (original equation)   

5 + 0 - 12 = 2(0) - 7 (plug in value of x)   

5 + 0 - 12 = 0 - 7 (did multiplication)   

-7 = -7 (did addition on both sides)       

since -7 equals -7, that demonstrates that the value of 0 for x is correct.   

trying x = 1   

5 + x - 12 = 2x - 7 (original equation)   

5 + 1 - 12 = 2(1) - 7 (plug in value of x)   

5 + 1 - 12 = 2 - 7 (did multiplication)   

-6 = -5 (did addition on both sides)       

since -6 is obviously not equal to -5, the value of 1 for x is wrong.

1. sometimes

2.   never

3   .08c = 7.50+.05c   250 pages

step-by-step explanation:

1.   sometimes

the theoretical probability of rolling a 1 is 1/6.   perhaps you got really lucky and never rolled a 1   in those 60 times.   your experimental probability is 0.   or perhaps you rolled a 1   20 times.   your experimental probability is 20/60 is 1/3.     it really just depends on how you rolled in that experiment.

2.   never

the probability of the event occurring is 1.   that is being 100 % sure it will happen.   that is the maximum amount of confidence we have.

3.   no customer card cost:   .08 times number of pages

customer card cost:   7.50 + .05 times number of pages

we want to find when it costs the same amount, so we will set these equal

let c = number of pages

.08c = 7.50+.05c

subtract .05c from each side

.08c-.05c = 7.5+.05c-.05c

.03c=7.5

divide each side by .03

.03c/.03 = 7.5/03

c =250  

the cost is the same at 250 pages