Desperate please help brainliest!

Here is their argument. given the obtuse angle x, we make a quadrilateral abcd with ∠dab = x, and ∠abc = 90◦, and ad = bc. say the perpendicular bisector to dc meets the perpendicular bisector to ab at p. then pa = pb and pc = pd. so the triangles pad and pbc have equal sides and are congruent. thus ∠pad = ∠pbc. but pab is isosceles, hence ∠pab = ∠pba. subtracting, gives x = ∠pad−∠pab = ∠pbc −∠pba = 90◦. this is a preposterous conclusion – just where is the mistake in the "proof" and why does the argument break down there?

What is the y-intercept of the line given by the equation

What is the quotient? x+5/ 3x²+4x+5 © 3x2 – 11 + x + s 3x – 11 + 60 x + 5 o 3x2 - 11 - 50 x + 5 3x – 11 - - x + 5