Is the following Inductive Generalization strong or weak? Apply and explain the three checks: 1. Is the appropriate group sampled? 2. Is the sample truly random? 3. Is the sample adequate in number? Then give your verdict: strong or weak.

Oxytocin seems to make people more inclined to trust strangers with their cash. In a game in which 58 volunteers could invest money with anonymous trustees, economist Ernst Fehr of the University of Zurich and his colleagues dosed half the subjects with a whiff of oxytocin while the others received an inert placebo nose spray (but were told it was a real drug). After investors who sniffed the actual oxytocin were twice as likely to invest all their funds.

For the reasons mentioned in the explanation section, it is indeed a weak generalization:  

Step-by-step explanation:

the central idea is that:

individuals should refuse to cooperate with institutions they believe unjust.

thoreau felt  that governments were more often agents of corruption than justice, even democracies, and that just because the majority feels a certain way does not make it just or correct in absolute terms. he uses the fact that slavery exists in our democracy to support this idea.

he goes on to say that, as a result, people should live true to their own internal laws regarding right and wrong, as a product of reflection and a moral life, rather than following every law that society imposes. 

step-by-step explanation: