A student in a wildlife biology class wants to determine the abundance of a rodent species in a local nature preserve, divided into smaller blocks. She is concerned that she only has a modest number of traps and time to do the project, and wants to select the most appropriate sampling or experimental study design.
1. Which one of the following is most appropriate for this study?
Group of answer choices:
a. Natural experiment (observational study)
b. Stratified sampling
c. Cluster sampling
d. Systematic sampling

Cluster sampling

Step-by-step explanation:

Cluster sampling is almost always more economical or more practical than stratified sampling or simple random sampling as it reduces costs by increasing sampling efficiency. Due to the fact that she has limited resources, this method is better to observe clusters of units in a population than randomly selected distributed in the local nature preserve and this method is more economical and quick.

120 seems like the most sensible answer.

step-by-step explanation:

if there is only one topping on all caramel apples and there's 120 of them. then all apples should/will be covered in sprinkles. make sense?

6,250

step-by-step explanation:

to get the area, multiply 360 by 160.(57,600)

to find out how many bags of fertilizer it will take, first figure out how many square feet one bag can hold. divide 1000 by 8(125) to get the unit rate(how many square feet one pound of fertilizer can hold)and multiply it by 50(6250). if i haven't made a mistake, that is the answer.