PLEASE ANSWER THIS IN THE LAND OF CONFUSION

All the people in the Land of Confusion are either sages or jesters. Sages are noted for their honesty - they always tell the truth. Jesters, however, are always kidding around and never tell the truth. Unfortunately, there is no way to tell one from the other just by looking at them. Ima Visitor leaves her home in the Enchanted Kingdom and travels to the Land of Confusion. While there, she meets three men: Xavier, Yale and Zachary. Ima asks, “How many of you are sages?”

Xavier says that he is not a jester.

Yale says that Xavier is lying.

Zachary adds, “Yale is lying.”

Can you figure out who is a sage and who is a jester?

Two kids in the Land of Confusion

Ima keeps on walking. Just as she approaches the emperor’s palace, she finds a boy and a girl sitting on the steps, and hears three statements:

“I’m a boy,” says the child with black hair.

“I’m a girl”, says the child with red hair.

“Exactly one of us is a sage,” says the boy.

Are the boy and girl sages and/or jesters, and what color hair does each one have?

A Boast?

Upon entering the emperor’s palace, Ima overheard a man say, “If I am a sage, then so is my son.”

What can you tell about him or his son?

Meeting the King Inside the palace, Ima went looking for the King, and she met some sages. She asked them if the King is a sage or a jester, and they told her that they didn’t know, but that according to their laws, he must be a citizen of the Land of Confusion, either a sage or a jester. Just then, a man entered the hall wearing a crown and a beautiful purple cloak. The sages told Ima that it was the King, and that she could ask him whether he was a sage or a jester. To her question, the King responded, “I am a jester.” Immediately, the sages cried “Imposter! Arrest that man!”

Why?

step-by-step explanation:

6.48/4 4 goes into 6.48 1.62 times

the results from a pre-test for students for the year 2000 and the year 2010 are illustrated in the box plot. what do these results tell us about how students performed on the 29 question pre-test for the two years?

if we compare only the lowest and highest scores between the two years, we might conclude that the students in 2010 did better than the students in 2010. this conclusion seems to follow since the lowest score of 8 in 2010 is greater in value than the lowest score of 6 in 2000. also, the highest score of 28 in 2010 is greater in value than the highest score of 27 in 2000.

but the box portion of the illustration gives us more detailed information. the middle bar in each box shows us that the median score of 20 in 2000 is greater in value than the median score of 17 in 2010. further, we note that the box and whiskers divide the illustration into four pieces. each of these four pieces represents the same portion of students. so, the upper half of the students in 2000 scored in the same score range as the upper one-fourth of the students in 2010, see the illustration at a score of 20.

by considering the upper one-fourth, upper half, and upper three-fourths instead of just the lowest and highest scores, we would conclude that the students as a whole did much better in 2000 than in 2010. we would conclude that as a whole the students in 2010 are less prepared than the students in 2000.

in this section, we discuss box-and-whisker plots and the five key values used in constructing a box-and-whisker plot. the key values are called a five-number summary, which consists of the minimum, first quartile, median, third quartile, and maximum.

step-by-step explanation:

step-by-step explanation:

25/6 hope it : )

step-by-step explanation: