This exercise is based on summary statistic rather than raw data. This information is typically all that is presented in published reports. Inference procedures can be calculated by hand from the summaries. You must trust that the authors understood the conditions for inference and verified that they apply. This is not always true. Avandia, rosiglitazone maleate, is an oral antidiabetic drug produced by the pharmaceutical company GlaxoSmithKline Before a drug can be prescribed, we must know how the body absorbs and excretes it. Patients were given a single dose of either 1 mg or 2 mg of rosiglitazone, and the maximum plasma concentration of the drug (in ng/ml) was assessed. Treatment 32 76 13 32 156 42 We would like to know if there is significant evidence that maximum plasma concentration is dose-dependent. Choose the null and alternative hypotheses for the test, where μ1 and μ2 are the means for the patient groups which received 1 mg and 2 mg of Avandia drug respectively lo: μ1 = μ2 versus H a H2 Select the correct combination of the test statistic, the conservative number of degrees of freedom and the P-value for the test. 〇1--607, df = 30, 0.0005 < P-value < 0.001. O t =-10.29. df = 36.9. P-value < 0.0005 O 6.07, df 34.6, P-value 0.0005 O 1 =-10.29. df= 3 1,0.0005 < P-value < 0.001. Select the correct conclusion. O There is not enough evidence to make a conclusion Select the correct conclusion There is not enough evidence to make a conclusion O The sample size is too smal for statistical inference. O There is very strong evidence that maximum plasma concentration for Avandia is dose-dependent. O There is not enough evidence that maximum plasma concentration for Avandia is dose-dependent.