Juan examines the sequence 1, 3, 4, 7, 11, . . . and draws the conclusion that the next number in the sequence is 18. Which statements regarding the situation are accurate? Check all that apply. Juan used inductive reasoning.
Juan's conclusion is a conjecture.
Juan's conclusion is not possible.
Juan's conclusion is a counterexample.
Juan based his conclusion on patterns.

answer: b. f(x) = (x + 2)^3 (x^2 - 7x + 3)^4

step-by-step explanation:

polynomials always have as many roots as their order. this is a 4th order polynomial- hence 4 roots!

complex roots of polynomials always come in pairs. the quadratic equation has the "+/-" in that will alwaysgenerate m+ni amd m-ni, so 7-2i must be a root of this polynomial equation.

the order of the numerator and denominator are both 2. so the horizontal asymptote is y=a2/b2 =7

verticle asymptotes are the forbidden x-values. f(x) becomes undefined at x=-3 because this value will cause a zero denominator.

a graph of r(x) will have vertical asymptotes at ±1 because these values will make the denominator zero. so the domain of the function cannot include ±1.

you 're wlecome! : )

cretdit to source

answer: 323 is how many she has ☃☃⛄❄

step-by-step explanation:

$113.42

i hope that is right.

step-by-step explanation:

1.) 21

2.) 0.453

3.) 1.5

4.) 48

5.) $ 22

step-by-step explanation: