Look at the argument below. Which of the following symbolic statements shows the set-up used to find the validity of the argument? If it is July, then I am living at the lake.
I am not living at the lake.
Therefore, it is not July.

p: It is July.
q: I am living at the lake.
A.
[(p → q) ∧ ~q]
∴ p
B.
[(p → q) → q]
∴ p
C.
[(p → q) ∧ ~q]
∴ ~p
D.
[(p → q) ∧ q]
∴ p

d (5 x (-20)) * (100 x (0.7))

step-by-step explanation:

5÷1/100 * -.7 *-20

copy dot flip

5*100 * -.7 *-20

rearrange

5*-20   * 100 *-.7

-100   *-70

7000

the answer is b. 60. each interior angle in 120, so the exterior angle must be 60 in order to add up to 180

step-by-step explanation:

on monday rodney ate 1/4th of the sandwich = 3/12

on tuesday he ate 1/3rd of the sandwich = 4/12

therefore in total he has eaten = 3/12 + 4/12 = 7/12

thus we can say that he has eaten 7/12 of the sandwich on monday and tuesday alltogether.

happy to

pls mark as brainliest.