What is the range of the function shown in the graph?

Here is their argument. given the obtuse angle x, we make a quadrilateral abcd with ∠dab = x, and ∠abc = 90◦, and ad = bc. say the perpendicular bisector to dc meets the perpendicular bisector to ab at p. then pa = pb and pc = pd. so the triangles pad and pbc have equal sides and are congruent. thus ∠pad = ∠pbc. but pab is isosceles, hence ∠pab = ∠pba. subtracting, gives x = ∠pad−∠pab = ∠pbc −∠pba = 90◦. this is a preposterous conclusion – just where is the mistake in the "proof" and why does the argument break down there?

Radii ok and nl are perpendicular to om because of the radius-tangent theorem. by definition of perpendicular, angles kom and lnm are right angles. this means that triangles kom and lnm are right triangles. angle lmn is common to both right triangles, so by the triangles kom and lnm are similar.

Which statement accurately explains whether a reflection over the y-axis and a 270° counterclockwise rotation would map figure acb onto itself? a coordinate plane with figure acb with point a at 1, 1, c at 3, 4 and b at 5, 1 yes, a″c″b″ is located at a″(1, 1), c″(4, 3), and b″(1, 5) yes, a″c″b′ is located at a″(1, 1), c″(3, 4), and b″(5, 1) no, a″c″b″ is located at a″(1, 1), c″(4, 3), and b″(1, 5) no, a″c″b″ is located at a″(1, 1), c″(3, 4), and b″(5, 1)