Onsider the enlargement of the triangle with a scale factor of 8 2 triangles have corresponding side lengths of 8 centimeters and 64 centimeters. Side A corresponds with a side with length of 2 centimeters. Side A = 2(8) = 16 cm. What is the length of side B?

Incomplete question

Step-by-step explanation: The question does not provide a diagram, and that makes it difficult to determine which side is labelled as B. Nevertheless I will give you clues to help you answer your question by explaining  this topic which is SIMILAR TRIANGLES.

When you have been given two triangles with a scale factor, the scale factor is an important part of answering the question eventually.

Consider a triangle which I shall call triangle 1, with sides abc and another triangle ABC, which I shall call triangle 2. The scale factor is 8, which means triangle 1 can be enlarged into a similar triangle by simply multiplying any corresponding side by 8. Hence, if in triangle abc, you have a side that measures 8 centimetres, the corresponding side in triangle ABC would be 8 times 8 which equals 64 centimetres.

The question states that side A corresponds with a side measuring length 2 centimetres. That means side A is derived as 2 times 8 which equals 16 centimetres, as explained above (and as shown in the question). Therefore side B which is yet unknown shall also be the corresponding side in triangle 1 multiplied by 8.

Since the corresponding side was not stated, I shall assume for the sake of explanation that the corresponding side is 10 centimetres. That means, side B would now be derived as 10 times 8 which equals 80 centimetres.

These can be expressed mathematically as follows;

If A = 16, a = 2 and b = 10 then B would be calculated as follows;

A/a = B/b

16/2 = B/10

By cross multiplication, you now have

16 * 10 = 2 * B

160/2 = B

80 = B

Following these steps along with the explanations, the length of side B can be derived if the value of its corresponding side is given or a diagram is provided.

welll its a very hard question but ill

step-by-step explanation:

first you take the 6 dollars and add 10 to it then add the 50 to that then multiply by 8 with xy and your answer will be

hope this

the results from a pre-test for students for the year 2000 and the year 2010 are illustrated in the box plot. what do these results tell us about how students performed on the 29 question pre-test for the two years?

if we compare only the lowest and highest scores between the two years, we might conclude that the students in 2010 did better than the students in 2010. this conclusion seems to follow since the lowest score of 8 in 2010 is greater in value than the lowest score of 6 in 2000. also, the highest score of 28 in 2010 is greater in value than the highest score of 27 in 2000.

but the box portion of the illustration gives us more detailed information. the middle bar in each box shows us that the median score of 20 in 2000 is greater in value than the median score of 17 in 2010. further, we note that the box and whiskers divide the illustration into four pieces. each of these four pieces represents the same portion of students. so, the upper half of the students in 2000 scored in the same score range as the upper one-fourth of the students in 2010, see the illustration at a score of 20.

by considering the upper one-fourth, upper half, and upper three-fourths instead of just the lowest and highest scores, we would conclude that the students as a whole did much better in 2000 than in 2010. we would conclude that as a whole the students in 2010 are less prepared than the students in 2000.

in this section, we discuss box-and-whisker plots and the five key values used in constructing a box-and-whisker plot. the key values are called a five-number summary, which consists of the minimum, first quartile, median, third quartile, and maximum.

step-by-step explanation: