subject
Mathematics, 30.06.2020 15:01 bellajuliet13

A method currently used by doctors to screen patients for a certain type of cancer fails to detect cancer in 15% of the patients who actually have the disease. A new method has been developed that researchers hope will be able to detect cancer more accurately. A random sample of 80 patients known to this type of cancer is screened using the new method and the method failed to detect the cancer in 8 patients. At the 5% level of significance, can the researchers conclude that the new method is better than the one currently in use? (Can they conclude that the new method fails to detect cancer in less than 15% of the patients who actually have the disease?)

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on Mathematics

question
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 15:50
Fredrick designed an experiment in which he spun a spinner 20 times and recorded the results of each spin
Answers: 1
question
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 16:30
Look at attachment. has all info needed. need
Answers: 1
question
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 16:50
Its worth 10000000 points need asap if you answer correctly ill mark brainliest
Answers: 1
question
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 17:40
The perimeter of a rectangle is greater than or equal to 74 meters. if the length is 25 meters, the minimum width of the rectangle is meters.
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
A method currently used by doctors to screen patients for a certain type of cancer fails to detect c...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 11.06.2021 22:10
question
Mathematics, 11.06.2021 22:10
question
Mathematics, 11.06.2021 22:10
Questions on the website: 13722367