The researcher decided that the population growth followed a geometric sequence. He wrote the explicit formula an = 1000(2)n – 1 to model the growth, and used this formula to predict the populations for years 6, 10, and 50. Do you agree with the researcher's method of predicting the populations? Why or why not?

$53.50

step-by-step explanation:

you have to subtract the amount of money chuck earned ($72.50) by the cost of the gas for the mower ($11.25) and the new string for the trimmer he bought ($7.75).

72.50-11.25=61.25

and then subtract $61.25 by the second thing he bought (the new string for the trimmer)

61.25-7.75=53.5

so in total it's $53.50 (53 dollars and 50 cents)

answer: '

the distance between points l and m

step-by-step explanation:

c

step-by-step explanation:

15.36 per mile

but forgot to round

i am pretty sure