Iḿ in early college this stuff is hard. The question is ab+3c=2d, for b

The domain of a function can be represented by which one of the following options? o a. a set of output values o b. a set of f(x) values o c. a set of input values o d. a set of both input and output values

Which is a logical conclusion based on the given information? a. figure abcd is a rhombus by the definition of a rhombus. b. segment ac is congruent to segment dc by cpctc. c. angle acb is congruent to angle adc by the angle-side-angle theorem. d. triangle acd is congruent to triangle cab by the hypotenuse-leg theorem.

Why is causation so much more difficult to prove than correlation?