1 TIME REMAINING
55:00
4
3
2
-11
2
Leslie analyzed the graph to determine if the function it represents is linear or non-linear. First she found three points on
the graph to be (-1,-4), (0, -3), and (2,5). Next, she determined the rate of change between the points (-1, 4) and (0,
-3-(-4) 1
5-(-3) 8
-3) to be 0-(-1- 1 - 1 and the rate of change between the points (0, -3) and (2,5) to be 2-0 2
- 4. Finally, she
concluded that since the rate of change is not constant, the function must be linear. Why is Leslie wrong?

you cant answer this dummy

step-by-step explanation:

the simplified form is

step-by-step explanation:

we want to simplify the expression,

let us change the middle bar to a normal division sign to obtain,

we multiply the first fraction by the reciprocal of the second fraction to obtain,

we factor to obtain,

we cancel the common factors to get,

we simplify to get,

the correct answer is b

since we know that the two functions are equal, f (x) = g

(x), therefore when we equate the two equations the result should be similar to

3x = x – 4:

a. f(x) = 3x, g(x) = x – 4

equating the two functions:

3x = x – 4             (correct)

so we now got our answer (a)

~dasgupta/mathbook/append17dec2k8.pdf