Ted knows that a rational number can be written as a ratio of two integers as long as the denominator is not zero. He thinks π is a rational number, because 22/7 fits the definition. Explain why Ted is wrong.

x ≥ 18 is your answer

step-by-step explanation:

let "a number" = x

(2/3)x + 17 ≥ 29

isolate the variable (x). do the opposite of pemdas (parenthesis, exponent (& root), multiplication, division, addition, subtraction).

first, subtract 17 from both sides.

(2/3)x + 17 (-17) ≥ 29 (-17)

(2/3)x ≥ 29 - 17

(2/3)x ≥ 12

next, multiply 3/2 to both sides to isolate the x

(3/2)(2/3)x ≥ 12(3/2)

x ≥ 12(3/2)

simplify. multiply, then divide

x ≥ (12 * 3)/2

x ≥ (36)/2

x ≥ 18

x ≥ 18 is your answer

~

step-by-step explanation:

4  

25

5258y

54.

t5

5r

54

5856

542

5458

86

.8558.65

565

565

55898

786

8/95

5896

8656265

556478

true. i hope this ! go answer some of my newest

false, it is 3

-35* 3 = -105